|

Air Pollution and Odour Control for Category 3 Animal By-Products Processing

Two-stage packed column scrubber system for air pollution and odour control on poultry blood spray dryer line (8000 m3/h, 80°C process air)

Technical summary

Flow rate: 8,000 m³/h
Industry: Animal by-product ABP transformation
Technology: 1 Acidic + 1 Alkali/oxidative PC-1 single staged scrubbers
Target pollutans: Odour, ammonia, VOC
Process air temperature: 80°C

Two-Stage Packed Column Scrubber – 8,000 m³/h at 80°C

Air Pollution and Odour Control for Category 3 animal by-products processing requires a deep understanding of how emissions are generated during the thermal treatment of protein-rich organic matrices.

In this application, poultry blood classified as Category 3 Animal By-Products (ABP Cat.3) is thermally dehydrated to produce a stable protein powder intended for valorisation.

The exhaust air from the process presents:

  • high humidity
  • temperatures up to 80°C
  • protein-derived aerosols
  • nitrogen-based odorous compounds
  • volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
  • potential ammonia traces

In ABP Category 3 processing, odour generation is not constant but strongly linked to:

  • raw material freshness
  • thermal load
  • protein degradation dynamics
  • transient operating conditions

Total treated airflow: 8,000 m³/h
Maximum gas temperature: 80°C

The project concerned a new Air Pollution and Odour Control system, fully integrated into the Category 3 processing line.

Engineering objective

The objective of this Air Pollution and Odour Control installation was to:

  • stabilise odour emissions from ABP Cat.3 processing
  • remove nitrogen-based compounds
  • control high humidity exhaust streams
  • ensure chemical stability under variable loads
  • guarantee long-term operational reliability

In Category 3 animal by-products processing, emissions originate from protein denaturation and partial degradation.
This means the system must manage both:

  • soluble alkaline compounds
  • oxidisable organic fractions

A purely hydraulic solution would not be sufficient.
The treatment architecture had to reflect the chemistry of the emission.

Selected architecture – Two-Stage Packed Column Scrubber

The chosen solution consists of two packed columns installed in series, each operating under controlled chemical conditions.

Related Case Studies

  • | |

    Why Your Ammonia Scrubber Is Not Working

    On paper, ammonia removal with a wet scrubber looks simple.
    Add acid. Control pH. Remove NH₃.

    In reality, many industrial scrubbers fail to remove ammonia consistently — even when all “parameters” seem correct.

    If your ammonia scrubber is not working, the problem is rarely a single variable.
    It is almost always a process issue, not a component issue.

    The Real Problem

    Ammonia absorption is not just a chemical reaction.
    It is a mass transfer process limited by:

    You don’t have “a pH”.

    Most scrubbers fail because they are designed as equipment, not as process systems.

    Why It Happens

    1. pH control is not enough

    Lowering pH shifts ammonia (NH₃) into ammonium (NH₄⁺), which is soluble.

    But:

    • local pH ≠ bulk pH
    • poor mixing creates zones where ammonia is not absorbed

    You don’t have “a single pH value”.
    You have a distribution of pH conditions inside the tower.

    2. L/G Ratio Is Too Low

    Ammonia absorption requires sufficient liquid flow.

    If the liquid-to-gas ratio (L/G) is too low:

    • contact area is reduced
    • absorption capacity is limited

    Typical failure:

    Scrubber sized on airflow only → insufficient liquid phase

    3. Poor Liquid Distribution

    Even with correct flow rate:

    • uneven spray
    • asymmetric piping
    • clogged nozzles

    create preferential paths.

    poor liquid distribution in wet scrubber nozzle spray pattern
    • Gas bypasses the liquid
    • Efficiency collapses

    This is one of the most underestimated causes of failure.

    4. Buffering Systems in the Liquid

    This is where most engineers get it wrong.

    In real systems:

    • carbonates
    • bicarbonates
    • ammonium salts

    create buffer systems

    Result:

    • pH does not drop as expected
    • acid consumption increases
    • ammonia removal becomes unstable

    The problem is not dosing.

    The problem is chemistry equilibrium.

    5. Insufficient Contact Time

    Short towers, high velocity, or undersized packing:

    • reduce residence time
    • limit absorption

    Ammonia removal is not instantaneous

    It requires time + interface

    6. Gas Conditions Are Ignored

    Temperature and saturation matter.

    • hot air reduces solubility
    • low humidity limits absorption
    • low humidity limits absorption

    A scrubber designed for “nominal conditions” will fail in real operation.

    What Most Engineers Get Wrong

    • Designing based only on airflow
    • Assuming pH = performance
    • Ignoring liquid distribution
    • Treating ammonia as a “simple pollutant”
    • Oversimplifying chemistry

    What Actually Works

    An ammonia scrubber works when:

    • L/G ratio is correctly sized
    • liquid distribution is uniform
    • pH is controlled considering buffering systems
    • contact time is sufficient
    • process variability is included in design

    This is not about adding more acid.
    It is about designing the system as a whole.

    When the System Cannot Work

    There are cases where:

    • tower is undersized
    • gas load is too high
    • variability exceeds design limits

    In these situations:

    • no adjustment will fix the problem
    • only a redesign or revamping will

    Can an Existing Scrubber Be Fixed?

    Sometimes, yes.

    Typical interventions:

    • increase liquid recirculation
    • redesign distribution system
    • introduce a second stage
    • modify chemical control strategy

    But:

    • not all systems are recoverable
    • and not all problems are “operational”

    Final Insight

    Ammonia removal is not difficult.

    But stable ammonia removal in real industrial conditions is.

    Is your ammonia scrubber underperforming?

    Contact us for a technical evaluation
  • |

    Polypropylene Scrubbers: Real Limits in Industrial Applications

    What Are Polypropylene Scrubbers?

    Polypropylene scrubbers are widely used in industrial air pollution control systems due to their excellent chemical resistance and relatively low cost.
    A Polypropylene scrubber is typically used in wet scrubbing applications where corrosive gases, odours or pollutants must be removed from air streams.
    However, in real industrial environments, Polypropylene scrubbers are often selected based only on chemical compatibility. This is where most design mistakes begin.

    Why Polypropylene Scrubbers Are So Common

    The success of scrubbers made in Polypropylene comes from three main factors:

    • High chemical resistance
    • Cost-effectiveness compared to stainless steel
    • Ease of fabrication

    For many standard applications, a polypropylene scrubber is a reliable and efficient solution.

    But this is only part of the story.

    The Real Limit of Polypropylene Scrubbers

    The main limitation of scrubbers made in Polyptopylene is not chemical resistance.

    It is mechanical behaviour under temperature.

    Polypropylene has a high thermal expansion coefficient:

    • 0.15–0.20 mm/m·°C

    In industrial scrubbers, this means that even small temperature variations can generate significant structural movement.

    Thermal Expansion in Polypropylene Scrubbers

    Thermal expansion is often underestimated during design.

    In real operation, it leads to:

    • Misalignment between scrubber and piping
    • Stress on flanges and connections
    • Progressive deformation of the structure
    • Long-term mechanical fatigue

    These effects are not immediate, but they become critical over time.

    In constrained layouts, like long duct runs with fixed supports, thermal expansion cannot dissipate. It accumulates.

    Polypropylene duct in constrained installation showing potential thermal expansion stress in industrial system

    Why Polypropylene Scrubbers Fail in Operation

    When scrubbers made in Polypropylene fail, the cause is rarely chemical.

    Typical failure mechanisms include:

    • Rigid piping connected to the scrubber
    • Lack of expansion compensation
    • Poor mechanical support design
    • Temperature fluctuations not considered

    In many cases, the problem is attributed to installation errors, while the real issue is design-related.

    Polypropylene vs Other Materials

    Polypropylene is often compared with other materials such as HDPE or stainless steel.

    Each material behaves differently:

    • Polypropylene scrubbers → excellent chemical resistance, high thermal expansion
    • HDPE scrubbers → better mechanical resilience, similar expansion issues
    • Stainless steel scrubbers → low expansion, but limited chemical resistance in aggressive environments

    There is no universally “best” material. The correct choice depends on the process conditions.

    When Polypropylene Work Well

    Polypropylene perform reliably when:

    • Temperature varies significantly
    • Large structures are mechanically constrained
    • The system is rigid and over-constrained
    • Long-term dimensional stability is critical

    In these cases, alternative materials or different design approaches should be considered.

    Conclusion: Understanding Polypropylene Scrubbers

    Polypropylene scrubbers are not a bad choice. They are often a misunderstood one.

    The key is not only to evaluate chemical resistance, but to understand how Polypropylene scrubbers behave under real operating conditions.

    In industrial air treatment, material selection is not a chemical decision. It is an engineering decision.

  • |

    Two-Stage Packed Column Scrubber for Pet Food Air Pollution Control

    Technical Summary

    Flow rate: 30,000 m³/h
    Industry: Pet food production
    Technology: PC-2 Two-stage packed column wet scrubber (acid stage + caustic-oxidative stage)
    Target pollutants: Amines, organic vapours, fatty acids, oil aerosols
    Process air characteristics: Emissions from extrusion, drying, coating and cooling phases

    Acid and caustic-oxidative stages designed around operational maintenance windows

    Air Pollution Control for Pet Food Production requires alignment between scrubber architecture and factory operating schedule.

    Air Pollution Control for Pet Food Production – two-stage packed column scrubber 30,000 m³/h
    Two-stage packed column scrubber installed for pet food air pollution control. Designed for 30,000 m³/h with maintenance-based operation strategy.

    Application context

    This Air Pollution and Odour Control system was designed to treat up to 30,000 m³/h of process air generated by a dry pet food production line operating on a single 8-hour shift.

    Air is extracted from the complete production cycle:

    • Extrusion
    • Drying
    • Coating
    • Cooling

    The emission profile includes:

    • Amines
    • Organic vapours
    • Fatty acids
    • Oil aerosols from coating phases

    Although airflow is relatively stable, contaminant concentration varies according to recipe formulation and coating intensity.

    Why a packed-only solution was selected

    Packed column scrubbers are often considered structurally limited in pet food applications because of oil mist deposition on the first stage packing.

    However, this limitation becomes critical only when production schedules do not allow regular maintenance.

    In this specific case, the production line operates on a single daily shift, providing predictable downtime. This makes it possible to:

    • Schedule periodic inspection
    • Perform cleaning when required
    • Manage progressive packing fouling as part of normal operation

    The engineering decision was therefore based on operational rhythm, not on catalogue standardisation.
    In this case, Air Pollution Control for Pet Food Production is based on predictable maintenance cycles rather than continuous elastic operation.

    System architecture

    The installed configuration consists of two separate packed columns, operating sequentially:

    First stage – Acid

    Designed to neutralise amines and stabilise odour load.

    Second stage – Caustic-oxidative scrubber

    Designed to complete neutralisation and improve robustness against residual organic compounds.

    The physical separation between stages allows:

    • Independent hydraulic and aeraulic control
    • Clear chemical segregation
    • Targeted maintenance planning

    This architecture remains structurally simple while ensuring staged treatment.

    This configuration was selected as a structured Air Pollution Control for Pet Food Production strategy aligned with the plant’s operating rhythm.

    Operational reality: fouling as a managed parameter

    In pet food production, oil aerosols generated during coating inevitably deposit on internal surfaces.

    In packed towers, the first stage becomes the primary deposition surface.

    Consequences over time may include:

    • Gradual pressure drop increase
    • Reduced mass transfer efficiency
    • Risk of channel formation
    • Foam generation

    In this installation, these effects are not treated as unexpected faults but as predictable phenomena integrated into the maintenance strategy.

    Because the factory does not operate continuously, the system remains viable and economically rational.

    Engineering positioning

    A two-stage packed column system can be an effective Air Pollution and Odour Control solution for pet food production up to 30,000 m³/h — provided that:

    • The plant does not operate continuously
    • Maintenance intervals are structurally available
    • Operational discipline is maintained

    Where these conditions exist, a packed-only architecture remains technically sound.

    Where production shifts increase or variability intensifies, reaction dynamics and fouling management require a different approach — which led to a more efficient evolution.

    When to choose a two-stage packed column scrubber

    Air Pollution Control for Pet Food Production can effectively rely on a two-stage packed column architecture when production operates on limited daily shifts and structured maintenance windows are available. In these conditions, oil mist deposition on the first stage packing can be managed through scheduled cleaning without compromising long-term stability. Where continuous three-shift production is required, reaction dynamics and fouling accumulation demand more elastic configurations.

  • |

    Industrial Biotrickling Filter Odour Control System

    Biotrickling Filtration Plant

    Technical Summary

    Air flow rate: 15,000 Nm³/h
    Main pollutants:
    Reduced sulphur compounds (H₂S)
    Treatment technology: Biotrickling filtration
    Number of filtration units: 2
    Contact time: 24 seconds per filter
    Design loading: 150 Nm³/h per m³ of packing


    This case study presents an industrial biotrickling filter odour control system designed to treat emissions from a wastewater treatment plant.
    The design follows the Best Available Techniques (BAT) described in the BREF for Waste Water and Waste Gas Treatment for biological air treatment systems and VDI 3478 part 1 norm.

    Overview

    Wastewater treatment plants can generate odorous emissions associated with reduced sulphur compounds, particularly hydrogen sulfide (H₂S).

    This project involved the design and installation of an industrial odour control system based on biotrickling filtration technology to treat contaminated air streams at a wastewater treatment facility.

    The plant was designed to treat 15,000 Nm³/h of odorous air, ensuring stable removal of sulphur-based odorous compounds through biological oxidation processes.

    Engineering Solution

    The odour control system consists of two parallel biotrickling filters, each designed to treat 7,500 Nm³/h of contaminated air.

    A centrifugal fan installed upstream conveys the polluted air to the filters through a distribution manifold.

    Inside the filters, the gas stream passes through a biological packing bed, where microorganisms immobilized on the carrier oxidize hydrogen sulfide and other reduced sulphur compounds into non-odorous forms.

    Biotrickling Filter Odour Control Technology

    Each filtration unit is built around a polypropylene basin containing the biological packing and irrigation system, designed to ensure proper gas distribution and stable microbial activity.

    Main Dimensions

    Parameter

    Value

    Lenght:

    10,000 mm

    Width:

    2,500 mm

    Height:

    3,300 mm

    The filters are constructed entirely in Polypropylene (PP) to ensure resistance against corrosive gases and acidic operating conditions associated with sulphur oxidation processes.

    The packing bed is supported by a reinforced polypropylene structural grid capable of supporting loads up to 2,500 kg/m².

    Biological Packing Media

    The filtration bed is filled with open-cell volcanic lapillus, selected for its suitability in biological filtration applications.

    Packing Characteristics

    • Particle size: 14–20 mm
    • Water retention capacity: 6–10 %
    • Available water: 4–7 %
    • Neutral pH
    • High surface area for microbial colonization
    • High mechanical stability

    These characteristics promote the formation of a stable microbial biofilm capable of degrading hydrogen sulfide efficiently.

    Liquid recirculation system

    Each filter includes an independent recirculation tank and irrigation network designed to maintain optimal moisture and nutrient conditions for biological activity.

    Main equipment

    • Polypropylene recirculation tank
    • Automatic make-up water valve
    • Visual level indicator
    • Pressure level transmitter (4–20 mA)
    • Automatic purge valve
    • Two AISI 316L submersible pumps (1.1 kW) per filter
    • Nutrient dosing pump
    • Spray irrigation system covering the entire packing surface

    This configuration ensures continuous wetting of the biological packing and stable microbial growth.

    Air Handling System

    Air movement through the treatment system is ensured by a centrifugal fan equipped with inverter control, allowing flow regulation and stable operating conditions.

    Fan Specifications

    Parameter

    Value

    Nominal air flow

    15,000 Nm³/h

    Maximum pressure

    250 mm w.c.

    Motor power

    18.5 kW

    Efficiency class

    IE3

    Noise level

    < 81 dB(A)

    A standby fan rated at 20,000 Nm³/h was also included to guarantee operational redundancy and maintenance flexibility.

    Automation and Control

    The system is managed through a PLC-based control panel designed to ensure fully automatic operation.

    Control Features

    • PLC control (Siemens S7-1200 or Schneider M221)
    • HMI operator interface
    • pH monitoring
    • Conductivity monitoring
    • Automatic make-up water control
    • Inverter control for the process fan
    • Remote status signals

    This architecture ensures reliable operation and simplified plant management.

    Key Outcomes

    The installed odour control system provides:

    • Effective removal of hydrogen sulfide and reduced sulphur compounds
    • Reliable odour abatement in wastewater treatment emissions
    • Stable long-term biological operation
    • Low chemical consumption thanks to biological oxidation processes

    Biotrickling filtration technology enables continuous treatment of odorous air streams with low operating costs and high process stability.

  • | | |

    Hydrogen Sulfide Removal in Air: Why Caustic Scrubbers Become Unstable

    Hydrogen sulfide removal is not a steady-state problem

    Hydrogen sulfide removal is one of the most common challenges in industrial air treatment.
    In many systems, caustic scrubbers are used as the primary solution to remove H2S.
    On paper, the chemistry is simple.
    In real operation, these systems often become unstable.

    • H2S is absorbed into the liquid phase
    • it reacts with sodium hydroxide (NaOH)
    • it forms soluble sulfide compounds

    On paper, the process is stable.

    In real operation, it is not.

    The chemistry is predictable. The system is not

    The reaction between hydrogen sulfide and caustic soda is well known:

    • H2S + NaOH → NaHS + H2O
    • NaHS + NaOH → Na2S + H2O

    This is not where the problem lies.

    The issue is that industrial air systems do not operate under controlled, steady conditions.

    In real plants:

    • H2S concentration fluctuates
    • emissions occur in peaks, not averages
    • humidity changes continuously
    • aerosols and particulates interfere with mass transfer

    Why hydrogen sulfide removal becomes unstable

    A caustic scrubber is typically designed around average inlet conditions.

    But real systems are defined by variability.

    When peak loads occur:

    • the reaction accelerates locally
    • sulfide concentration in the liquid increases rapidly
    • the recirculation loop changes composition

    Over time:

    • salinity increases
    • mass transfer efficiency drops
    • system response becomes non-linear

    The scrubber still works.

    But it stops working predictably.

    pH control does not guarantee performance

    In many hydrogen sulfide removal systems, pH is used as the primary control parameter.

    The assumption is straightforward:

    high pH ensures effective H2S removal.

    In practice:

    • pH does not reflect sulfide accumulation
    • it does not represent real absorption capacity
    • it does not capture mass transfer limitations

    Operators may observe a stable pH

    while the system performance is deteriorating.

    As a result:

    • caustic consumption increases
    • removal efficiency fluctuates
    • corrective actions become reactive instead of controlled

    pH is an indicator.
    It is not a control strategy.

    Field reality: transient H2S release in industrial processes

    In many industrial processes, hydrogen sulfide is not released at a constant rate.

    A clear example is found in tannery operations during the pickling phase.

    In these conditions:

    • acidic environments react with residual sulfides
    • H2S is released rapidly
    • emissions occur in short, high-intensity peaks

    The key issue is not the average concentration.

    It is the transient load.

    A caustic scrubber exposed directly to these peaks:

    • reacts, but not in a controlled way
    • accumulates reaction products quickly
    • loses operational stability

    Hydrogen sulfide removal becomes a continuous correction process.

    Hydrogen sulfide removal requires load control

    The most critical mistake in H2S treatment design is assuming that the final stage can handle everything.

    In reality, hydrogen sulfide removal requires load management upstream.
    This is where pre-treatment becomes essential.

    The role of pre-treatment in hydrogen sulfide removal

    Iron-based media systems (CIF) are often used as a pre-treatment stage.

    clean catalytic iron media used in CIF systems for hydrogen sulfide removal before sulfur formation
    severe sulfur fouling on pall rings in H2S removal system reducing airflow and efficiency

    They are not designed to remove all hydrogen sulfide.

    Their function is to:

    • reduce peak concentrations
    • stabilize inlet conditions
    • protect downstream scrubbers

    When pre-treatment is correctly applied:

    • transient peaks are dampened
    • load becomes more uniform
    • the caustic scrubber operates within a manageable range

    This changes the system from reactive to controlled.

    Designing hydrogen sulfide removal for real conditions

    Effective hydrogen sulfide removal systems are not designed around average values.

    They are designed around:

    • variability
    • peak loads
    • real process behavior

    A caustic scrubber without pre-treatment is forced to absorb all fluctuations.

    And no single stage can do that reliably.

    A necessary distinction in hydrogen sulfide removal

    Hydrogen sulfide removal in industrial air systems must be treated as a specific engineering problem.

    Air treatment systems are characterized by:

    • low but highly variable concentrations
    • intermittent emissions
    • complex mixtures of contaminants

    Design approaches taken from other processes
    do not apply directly.

    Each system must be designed based on its actual operating conditions.

    Hydrogen sulfide removal does not fail because the chemistry is wrong.
    It fails because the system is designed for average conditions
    instead of real variability.

    Evaluate whether your hydrogen sulfide removal system is designed as a machine or as a process

  • |

    Industrial Odour Control System for Meat and Fish Smoking Processes

    Technical Summary

    Flow rate: 500 Nm³/h
    Industry: Meat and smoked fish processing
    Technology: Venturi scrubber + three-stage packed column wet scrubber
    Target pollutants: Organic vapours, fatty acids, amines, H₂S and mercaptans
    Process air temperature: Ambient
    Emission limits @ stack: 300 OU/Nm³ odour, 50 mg/Nm³ TOC, 1 mg/Nm³ H₂S & mercaptans, 3 mg/Nm³ NH₃ & amines

    Industrial Odour Control System for Meat and Fish Smoking Processes

    Industrial air pollution control in meat and fish smoking facilities requires careful integration with production airflow and odour emission characteristics.
    This case study describes the design of an industrial odour control system for smoking emissions from meat and fish processing, based on wet scrubbing technology and multistage chemical treatment.
    This industrial odour control system was designed to treat smoke emissions generated during meat and fish smoking processes.

    Industrial wet scrubber system for odour control from meat and fish smoking processes, featuring multistage packed column scrubber and chemical dosing units.

    Application Context – Air Emissions from Meat and Fish Smoking

    This project concerns the installation of an industrial air pollution and odour control system for a gourmet meat and smoked fish processing facility.
    The extraction system collects air emissions generated during:

    • meat smoking processes
    • fish smoking chambers
    • product cooling stages
    • handling and packaging areas

    Air emissions from smoking operations typically contain:

    • organic vapours generated by thermal degradation of fats
    • fatty acids and condensable smoke compounds
    • amines released from protein processing
    • sticky soot particles generated during meat and fish smoking

    For this reason, the air pollution control system was designed as a controlled hydraulic load rather than an active disturbance to the production process.

    Wet Scrubber Architecture for Odour Abatement

    The installed odour control system combines Venturi pre-scrubbing and multistage packed column wet scrubbing.

    Venturi Scrubber – Aerosol and Smoke Particle Removal

    The first treatment stage is a Venturi scrubber with mobile bed separator, designed to remove:

    • tar droplets from smoke emissions
    • oil aerosols generated during smoking
    • condensable particulate fractions.

    The Venturi stage increases gas velocity to improve inertial impaction efficiency, enhancing the capture of aerosol particles.

    Multistage Packed Column Scrubber (series of 3 single stage)

    Downstream treatment is performed in two vertical packed column scrubbers operating in countercurrent flow configuration.
    The three chemical stages include:

    Acid stage

    • neutralisation of alkaline compounds
    • stabilisation of odour load

    Oxidative stage

    • oxidation of reduced sulphur compounds
    • removal of hydrogen sulphide and mercaptans

    Alkaline stage

    • neutralisation of residual acidic compounds
    • neutralisation of residual oxidative compounds, such as Chlorine.
    • final polishing of odorous emissions.

    Structured liquid distribution systems and demisters ensure stable mass transfer efficiency and droplet separation.

    Chemical Dosing and Process Control

    The system includes automatic chemical dosing units for process control.

    Reagents used include:

    • sulphuric acid for pH correction
    • sodium hypochlorite for enhanced odour destruction
    • sodium hydroxide for alkaline neutralisation

    Online monitoring ensures process stability through:

    • pH control
    • ORP (redox potential) monitoring

    These parameters allow dynamic adjustment of chemical dosing according to actual emission conditions.

    Air Extraction and Process Stability

    Air extraction is performed through a polypropylene duct system connected to a high-efficiency centrifugal fan.

    Key design characteristics include:

    • corrosion-resistant materials (PP and PVC)
    • controlled airflow at 500 Nm³/h
    • downstream fan installation to maintain negative pressure.

    The fan operates with stable rotational speed to ensure:

    • constant airflow through the scrubber
    • stable pressure conditions in the process ductwork
    • reliable odour capture.

    Emission Performance and Environmental Compliance

    Engineering Insight – Odour Control in Smoking Facilities

    In meat and fish smoking plants, air pollution control cannot be designed based solely on airflow.

    Effective odour control requires understanding:

    • aerosol formation during smoking
    • variability of organic vapours
    • sulphur compound formation
    • interaction between process airflow and treatment units.

    For this reason, industrial odour control systems must be designed as process-integrated solutions rather than simple end-of-pipe equipment.